On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 6:16 PM Martin Thomson <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 18, 2021, at 11:04, Eric Rescorla wrote: > > To clarify my position: i would favor a proposed standard based on > > O-HTTP. I just think it's unfortunate to have something that is > > approximately O-HTTP but not precisely as PS at the same time as we are > > also standardizing O-HTTP > > Makes sense. I would question the value of publishing the experimental > approximately-but-not-quite-O-HTTP version then. Unless we fail majestically > in chartering and executing there, we're not talking about significant delays.
I suspect the broader application space of O-HTTP makes it a bit messier, and it could take a while to hammer out all the details. I for one want to use O-HTTP for POST requests. As for this draft I support adoption targeting experimental. Sincerely, Watson Ladd -- Astra mortemque praestare gradatim _______________________________________________ dns-privacy mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
