Hey Paul,
Clarifying question about SVCB...
On 3/22/21 5:10 PM, Paul Hoffman wrote:
> On Mar 22, 2021, at 1:59 PM, Stephen Farrell <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>> I think that makes sense with one caveat: I don't interpret
>> these changes as representing a consensus to not use TLSA - I
>> think such a decision is still down the road some, after we
>> have some better ideas as to the practicality or otherwise
>> of the various approaches one might adopt.
>>
>> I know none of these are WG drafts yet but I'd be a bit
>> worried that your changing to use SVCB now might be
>> intrepreted in that way.
>
> Good point. As we revise this draft, we can put a note in about us needing a
> signal, and use SCVB as the signal, but the signal might change.
>
Is there an issue with putting SVCB info in the TLD zones? If I
interpret this ICANN document correctly
(https://newgtlds.icann.org/sites/default/files/agreements/agreement-approved-31jul17-en.html#exhibitA.1),
there are strict limitations on the info that can be put in the TLD zones.
Regards,
Brian
_______________________________________________
dns-privacy mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
