> On 23 Mar 2021, at 14:16, Brian Haberman <[email protected]> wrote: > > Is there an issue with putting SVCB info in the TLD zones?
Yes - for gTLDs. Almost all of them have contracts with ICANN. Adding SVCB records to ccTLDs is easier (in principle) since few (any?) of them have contracts with ICANN. Since those gTLD contracts say “no SVCB records”, registries can’t/shouldn’t add them to their zones. > If I interpret this ICANN document correctly > (https://newgtlds.icann.org/sites/default/files/agreements/agreement-approved-31jul17-en.html#exhibitA.1), > there are strict limitations on the info that can be put in the TLD zones. Indeed. It is possible to get these contracts to be amended. But it will take endless rounds of meetings, task forces and consultations before an appropriate board resolution could be passed and implemented. Good luck with that... What would be the point of putting SVCB records in a TLD (or the root)? It seems like a remarkably bad idea to me. _______________________________________________ dns-privacy mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
