> On 23 Mar 2021, at 22:32, Paul Wouters <[email protected]> wrote: > > So what is it that you are exactly objecting to? The syntax or the capability?
The capability - mostly. TLDs should not be publishing SVCB records for the reasons I outlined before. I’m not too keen on using SVCB records apart from stubs finding resolvers on their local network. It’s OK for me to publish SVCB records in rfc1035.com for anyone who has the misfortune to be one of my local users and needs to find an encrypted resolver. IMO it’s not OK to do that in .com (say) for everthing on the planet that needs to lookup a .com domain name. This is all somewhat moot because I very much doubt any busy TLD will ever turn on DoT or DoH on their authoritative name servers. _______________________________________________ dns-privacy mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
