> -----Original Message----- > From: dns-privacy <dns-privacy-boun...@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Stephen > Farrell > Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2021 8:58 AM > To: Jim Reid <j...@rfc1035.com>; Brian Haberman > <br...@innovationslab.net> > Cc: dns-privacy@ietf.org > Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [dns-privacy] Root Server Operators Statement on > DNS Encryption > > > Hiya, > > On 31/03/2021 13:52, Jim Reid wrote: > > > We all want better privacy of course. For some definition of privacy. > > But what does that actually mean in the context of queries to > > authoritative servers at the root or TLDs? > > Workable answers for the root and TLDs are likely very different, as the scale > of risk is very different. > > I think it doesn't really help to try discuss both root servers and TLDs at > the > same time. > > > And is TLS the*only* game > > in town? > When encrypting DNS based on some standard protocol? It is, though of > course you can have that DoT or DoH or DoQ or maybe even opaquely > flavoured;-(
[SAH] Why assume that encryption is required to provide confidentiality? Scott _______________________________________________ dns-privacy mailing list dns-privacy@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
