On 31/03/2021 14:00, Hollenbeck, Scott wrote:
-----Original Message----- From: dns-privacy <dns-privacy-boun...@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Stephen Farrell Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2021 8:58 AM To: Jim Reid <j...@rfc1035.com>; Brian Haberman <br...@innovationslab.net> Cc: dns-privacy@ietf.org Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [dns-privacy] Root Server Operators Statement on DNS Encryption Hiya, On 31/03/2021 13:52, Jim Reid wrote:We all want better privacy of course. For some definition of privacy. But what does that actually mean in the context of queries to authoritative servers at the root or TLDs?Workable answers for the root and TLDs are likely very different, as the scale of risk is very different. I think it doesn't really help to try discuss both root servers and TLDs at the same time.And is TLS the*only* game in town?When encrypting DNS based on some standard protocol? It is, though of course you can have that DoT or DoH or DoQ or maybe even opaquely flavoured;-([SAH] Why assume that encryption is required to provide confidentiality?
I didn't make that assumption. S.
Scott _______________________________________________ dns-privacy mailing list dns-privacy@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
OpenPGP_0x5AB2FAF17B172BEA.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ dns-privacy mailing list dns-privacy@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
