On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 02:32:46PM +0100, Jim Reid <[email protected]> wrote a message of 13 lines which said:
> > RFC 7626 (the threat model and problem analysis that some people > > claim is missing) is clear (section 2.5.2 for instance). > > RFC7626 is 6 years old. RFC 793 is 39 years old. Let's drop TCP and move to QUIC (the RFCs are in the RCF-EDITOR state). And I'm too charitable to mention the age of DNS RFCs. > It predates the DoH and DoT (and soon DoQ) specs. So what? > Some other risks have changed since 2015 too. Please be specific and mention them. > It’s not your fault that fine RFC has been OBE. :-) I don't remember receving it from Elisabeth II <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Order_of_the_British_Empire> _______________________________________________ dns-privacy mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
