> -----Original Message----- > From: dns-privacy <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Paul > Hoffman > Sent: Monday, April 19, 2021 1:15 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [dns-privacy] [Ext] A Few More Suggestions for the > Requirements Draft > > On Apr 19, 2021, at 8:08 AM, Hollenbeck, Scott > <[email protected]> wrote: > > I have a few more suggestions for draft-ietf-dprive-phase2-requirements. > > Before we start making point-level suggestions for the draft, it would be > useful to know whether the draft is still being worked on, and what its > expected status will be. The draft has not been updated in nearly six months, > even though the authors said they would after the IETF meeting five months > ago. My feeling from that is that the authors have lost interest, and maybe > the WG has as well. > > The purpose of the draft has shifted significantly. The -02 draft changed from > "requirements" to "requirements and considerations". The meat of the draft > (Section 5) is no longer requirements, but "features"; however, there are > still > MUST and SHOULDs among those features. > > If the WG continues to work on this document, it would be good to first say > what it's new purpose is (such as requirements on solutions documents), and > whether it should be expected to be published as an RFC or just kept as a > checklist before the WG moves other documents forward.
That would be a good discussion to have. The WG charter currently says this: "Develop requirements for adding confidentiality to DNS exchanges between recursive resolvers and authoritative servers (unpublished document)." Does that need to change? Scott _______________________________________________ dns-privacy mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
