On Apr 19, 2021, at 1:43 PM, Brian Haberman <[email protected]> wrote: > > The goal of the referenced work item is to ensure that the WG > participants agree on the requirements.
Great, but then we're back to the question of what are "requirements", particularly because the current draft has moved away from that. > Having that be done in a draft > is far cleaner than relying on various people's recollections of > discussions. Fully agree, if we can agree what the base is. > If everyone goes back to the minutes of our session during IETF 110, > Benno explicitly told the WG that he is happy to work on a revision > *with WG input*. I view Scott's messages to the ML as being an attempt > to provide such feedback to the draft authors on what he sees as useful > changes to the draft. Scott's suggestions should be discussed to see > what suggestions have consensus. That feels premature, given that we don't actually know what the document is supposed to be about. --Paul Hoffman
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ dns-privacy mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
