Hi Paul, On 4/19/21 4:51 PM, Paul Hoffman wrote: > On Apr 19, 2021, at 1:43 PM, Brian Haberman <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> The goal of the referenced work item is to ensure that the WG >> participants agree on the requirements. > > Great, but then we're back to the question of what are "requirements", > particularly because the current draft has moved away from that. >
I agree that the current draft is not just about requirements. If I recall, that came about because some WG participants pushed back on hard requirements and really just wanted "design considerations". My view, as a WG participant, is that we need to decide how we want to use this document. >> Having that be done in a draft >> is far cleaner than relying on various people's recollections of >> discussions. > > Fully agree, if we can agree what the base is. > >> If everyone goes back to the minutes of our session during IETF 110, >> Benno explicitly told the WG that he is happy to work on a revision >> *with WG input*. I view Scott's messages to the ML as being an attempt >> to provide such feedback to the draft authors on what he sees as useful >> changes to the draft. Scott's suggestions should be discussed to see >> what suggestions have consensus. > > That feels premature, given that we don't actually know what the document is > supposed to be about. Then let's start with a conversation about what the WG wants out of this document. I'll start a separate thread for that. Regards, Brian
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ dns-privacy mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
