On Fri, 16 Jul 2021, Brian Haberman wrote:
Here is the preliminary agenda for the DPRIVE session at IETF 111.
If there are no objections or late additions, the chairs will cancel the
second 1-hour slot assigned to DPRIVE.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/111/materials/agenda-111-dprive-00
As we have two drafts that are assuming that SVCB records for a zone can
be served at the parent, I think we need to talk aboutthis at the meeting.
I've tried to convey that this is an unrealistic reality, and that work
should focus on this not happening, eg drafts should not specify
"interim" solutions for this to happen. It would be good to get clear
working group consensus on this so the draft authors can take that
consensus into account for future draft versions.
Paul
_______________________________________________
dns-privacy mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
