On Fri, Jul 16, 2021 at 12:43 PM Brian Haberman <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Paul, > > On 7/16/21 1:02 PM, Paul Wouters wrote: > > On Fri, 16 Jul 2021, Brian Haberman wrote: > > > >> Here is the preliminary agenda for the DPRIVE session at IETF 111. > >> If there are no objections or late additions, the chairs will cancel the > >> second 1-hour slot assigned to DPRIVE. > >> > >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/111/materials/agenda-111-dprive-00 > > > > As we have two drafts that are assuming that SVCB records for a zone can > > be served at the parent, I think we need to talk aboutthis at the > meeting. > > > > None of those draft authors requested agenda time. > Yeah, we've been swamped. We would like agende time if it's still available. -Ekr > > I've tried to convey that this is an unrealistic reality, and that work > > should focus on this not happening, eg drafts should not specify > > "interim" solutions for this to happen. It would be good to get clear > > working group consensus on this so the draft authors can take that > > consensus into account for future draft versions. > > If you want to lead that discussion, please let the chairs know. > > Regards, > Brian > > _______________________________________________ > dns-privacy mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy >
_______________________________________________ dns-privacy mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
