On Fri, 16 Jul 2021, Brian Haberman wrote:
Here is the preliminary agenda for the DPRIVE session at IETF 111.
If there are no objections or late additions, the chairs will cancel the
second 1-hour slot assigned to DPRIVE.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/111/materials/agenda-111-dprive-00
As we have two drafts that are assuming that SVCB records for a zone can
be served at the parent, I think we need to talk aboutthis at the meeting.
None of those draft authors requested agenda time.
okay.
I've tried to convey that this is an unrealistic reality, and that work
should focus on this not happening, eg drafts should not specify
"interim" solutions for this to happen. It would be good to get clear
working group consensus on this so the draft authors can take that
consensus into account for future draft versions.
If you want to lead that discussion, please let the chairs know.
I have raised an issue to the WG that I think the chairs should take on to
discuss and hopefully resolve at the meeting.
If you want me to do a short presentation of the issue to facilitate
that discussion, I am happy to help you with that.
Paul
_______________________________________________
dns-privacy mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
