Hiya,
On 02/08/2021 05:21, Martin Thomson wrote:
If we decided on a single answer for the first and in the negativefor the second, would that make authentication viable?
IMO we ought not just "decide" on most of the tricky ADoX issues but we should rather document the options sufficient to allow people to do experiments and then wait and see how those experiments go. I'd say a stable I-D is probably enough documentation to allow for experiments and I'd hope such experiments could be done in 6-12 months. I'd expect we might still be left with a few tricky issues, but that a number of those (where we might make wrong choices now) would be resolved once people try 'em out. So my suggestion is to review the I-Ds we have with a view to figuring out what's missing that's needed to allow such experiments, fix that and then "park" those I-Ds 'till we get results. That could be similar to how drafts are declared to be "interop drafts" in other WGs or could be a WGLC-like process. If we decided to try go that way, I'd be happy to try help get some such experiment going. Cheers, S.
OpenPGP_0x5AB2FAF17B172BEA.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ dns-privacy mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
