On Tue, Aug 3, 2021 at 4:55 PM Paul Hoffman <[email protected]> wrote:
> If the WG is going to go to DS in the parent to have a signed signaling > response, it would make sense that the signal in the child have an > identical format. If we go with that, I'd rather see CDS be used in the > child instead of SVCB. > I disagree. CDS is explicitly a signal from the Child to the Parent. It's literally in the name of the RR type. I would not want all the resolvers in the world to be reading CDS records as part of the iterative resolution process.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ dns-privacy mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
