On Aug 3, 2021, at 2:06 PM, Ben Schwartz <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 3, 2021 at 4:55 PM Paul Hoffman <[email protected]> wrote: >> If the WG is going to go to DS in the parent to have a signed signaling >> response, it would make sense that the signal in the child have an identical >> format. If we go with that, I'd rather see CDS be used in the child instead >> of SVCB. >> > I disagree. CDS is explicitly a signal from the Child to the Parent.
Yes, exactly. This is the best way to get those DS records in the parent. > It's literally in the name of the RR type. I would not want all the > resolvers in the world to be reading CDS records as part of the iterative > resolution process. Why is "all the resolvers in the world to be reading" an SVCB record better? --Paul Hoffman
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ dns-privacy mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
