It appears that Brian Haberman <[email protected]> said: >-=-=-=-=-=- >-=-=-=-=-=- > >Hi all, > In the interest of moving work forward, the chairs would like to >solicit reviews for >https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-schwartz-ds-glue-02 > >We are especially interested in implementer and operator views on the >approach described in the draft. > >Please review and provide comments to the mailing list, chairs, or authors.
Technically I don't see any problems but I still don't understand the semantics of signed glue. When the glue and the authoritative disagree for, say, the A record of a name server, what do you do? If you believe the authoritative and discard the glue, what was the benefit of the signed glue? Signed, still confused _______________________________________________ dns-privacy mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
