> On 16 Oct 2020, at 00:00, Dave Knight <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Maybe have the outgoing and existing chairs explicitly go out and >> encourage someone who hasn't served before to volunteer? > > I struggle to reconcile our efforts toward impartiality with the notion of > having the chairs encouraging a preferred candidate. It depends on what’s meant by encouragement. I'm fairly sure Paul means approaching someone (or more than one) and saying “Have you ever thought of becoming a WG co-chair?”. Which would be fine. He almost certainly wasn’t meaning the co-chairs dictate to the WG who they must select. Which obviously would not be fine. Encouraging someone to stand doesn’t necessarily mean there’s a preferred candidate (after all the WG makes the selection) or impartiality has been compromised.
- Re: [dns-wg] Volunteer list for RIPE DNS working group ch... João Damas
- Re: [dns-wg] Volunteer list for RIPE DNS working gro... Randy Bush
- Re: [dns-wg] Volunteer list for RIPE DNS working... Dave Knight
- Re: [dns-wg] Volunteer list for RIPE DNS working... Jim Reid
- Re: [dns-wg] Volunteer list for RIPE DNS working... Leo Vegoda
- Re: [dns-wg] Volunteer list for RIPE DNS working... Jim Reid
- Re: [dns-wg] Volunteer list for RIPE DNS working... Dave Knight
- Re: [dns-wg] Volunteer list for RIPE DNS working... Paul Ebersman
- Re: [dns-wg] Volunteer list for RIPE DNS working... Dave Knight
- Re: [dns-wg] Volunteer list for RIPE DNS working... Jim Reid
- Re: [dns-wg] Volunteer list for RIPE DNS working... Paul Ebersman
- Re: [dns-wg] Volunteer list for RIPE DNS working... Peter Koch
- Re: [dns-wg] Volunteer list for RIPE DNS working... Niall O'Reilly
- Re: [dns-wg] Volunteer list for RIPE DNS working... Benno Overeinder
