On Sun, Jan 12, 2020 at 10:20:40PM +0000, Harry Moyes wrote: > On 12/01/2020 15:40, Geert Stappers wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 09, 2020 at 10:33:43PM +0100, Geert Stappers wrote: > > > On Wed, Jan 08, 2020 at 04:37:32PM +0000, Harry Moyes wrote: > > > > > .... > > > > > > > > I've already mentioned this to the developers. > > > > > > Any prove of that? > > > > > > > > > > The change is apparently intentional. > > > Assumed or documented? > > > > > > > My questions from above are indeed terse. > > > > Let me elaborate > > |> > I've already mentioned this to the developers. > > |> > > |> Any prove of that? > > > > That question was written in the hope of getting an URL or email > > where can be read what was mentioned to the pihole developers. > > > > I still hope such email or URL pops up. The idea is to ask, > > differently as previously, to regain the lost functionality. > > > > Unless it has gone missing somewhere I have already replied to the question. > > I misunderstood the response I got from the pihole-FTL developers. > > pihole-FTL -v does not respond as dnsmasq does. Intentionally. > > However if you submit the request as > > pihole-FTL -- -v > > you get exactly the same response as from dnsmasq including the compiled > options. > > The subtly of the extra "--" passed me by initially. > > As I said in my previous post, if I had understood the reply I got better, > I'd have saved myself a load of pain. > > Other than possibly making that subtlety more obvious to the slower on the > uptake among us, like me, there is nothing else required here.
Acknowledge Regards Geert Stappers -- Yes, the right question is real challenge _______________________________________________ Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list Dnsmasqfirstname.lastname@example.org http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss