RFC 2308 enumerates the negative response types. It did not
invent new ones (AA=0 aside). They all existed in RFC 103[45]
as did referral. RFC 2308 just pointed out easy mistakes to
make.
If a nameserver does not understand these response enumerated
in RFC 2308 it is not RFC 103[45] compliant. If a nameserver
generates the wrong response, as in this case when it generated
a referral rather than one of the possible NODATA responses,
it is not RFC 103[45] compliant.
Mark
--
Mark Andrews, Nominum Inc.
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Strange behavior from resolvers? Mats Dufberg
- Re: Strange behavior from resolvers? Alex Kamantauskas
- Re: Strange behavior from resolvers? Mats Dufberg
- Re: Strange behavior from resolvers? Peter Koch
- Re: Strange behavior from resolvers? Mats Dufberg
- Re: Strange behavior from resolver... Eric A. Hall
- Re: Strange behavior from resolver... namedroppers
- Re: Strange behavior from reso... Mats Dufberg
- Re: Strange behavior from ... Eric A. Hall
- Re: Strange behavior from ... Mark . Andrews
- Re: Strange behavior from resolvers? Matt Crawford
- Re: Strange behavior from resolvers? Alex Kamantauskas
- Re: Strange behavior from resolvers? Matt Crawford
- Re: Strange behavior from resolver... Alex Kamantauskas
- Re: Strange behavior from reso... Sematimba Noah K
- Re: Strange behavior from ... Alex Kamantauskas
- Re: Strange behavior from resolver... Lars-Johan Liman
- Re: Strange behavior from reso... Sam Trenholme
- Re: Strange behavior from resolvers? Kandra Nyg�rds
- Re: Strange behavior from resolvers? David St. Germain
