Nothing I have would break if reverse doesn't work. It sounds like you
might have something that would break. Perhaps you are one shooting
yourself in the foot.
--Dean
On Fri, 21 Mar 2003, Brad Knowles wrote:
> At 9:22 PM -0500 2003/03/20, Dean Anderson wrote:
>
> > Nothing would break with the removal of reverse DNS, as no one is relying
> > on it for anything. (Anyone who is relying on it, shouldn't be.)
>
> Then feel free to de-activate all programs and systems you have
> that might potentially make any possible use of reverse DNS. But
> just because you want to shoot off your foot with a twelve-gauge
> shotgun using magnum 00-buckshot, please don't ask anyone else to
> join you.
>
> --
> Brad Knowles, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
> safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
> -Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania.
>
> GCS/IT d+(-) s:+(++)>: a C++(+++)$ UMBSHI++++$ P+>++ L+ !E-(---) W+++(--) N+
> !w--- O- M++ V PS++(+++) PE- Y+(++) PGP>+++ t+(+++) 5++(+++) X++(+++) R+(+++)
> tv+(+++) b+(++++) DI+(++++) D+(++) G+(++++) e++>++++ h--- r---(+++)* z(+++)
>
#----------------------------------------------------------------------
# To unsubscribe, send a message to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
