On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 05:15:59PM +0100, bert hubert wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 04:07:59PM +0000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > and perhaps more interesting, the old address for "B"
> > showed a tapering off of traffic and then an INCREASE
> > last year. Old L and J got their numbers less than a
> > decade ago. ... so i would not go back as far as the
> > begining of the Internet. Old B has been around for quite
> > a while longer.
>
> The increase in traffic might easily be due to more favourable connectivity
> to 'B', which would lead many resolver implementations to shift more queries
> to it.
>
> Bert
>
old "B" topolgy didnt change... :)
--bill
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
