> William F. Maton Sotomayor (wmaton) writes:
> >
> > I think it very may well be suited to that task, but are we crossing a lin
> e
> > here that may result down a path we might regret later on. I think what
> > would need to be worked out is what criteria would be used to declare a
> > local or nonsense domain, nonsense or junk, and have that suitably delegat
> ed
> > to AS112. It could go ad infinitum (ever word in every language), or it
> > could be we need to take whatever floats to the top 25 of a domain lookup
> > chart. Of course, someone needs to determine what makes a good sample to
> > create that statistic.
>
> The first step is to decide whether delegating to AS112 is reserved
> to standardized (read: RFC) zones, like RFC1918, 169.254, etc..., or
> whether anything sufficiently large -- and bogus -- is sufficient.
>
> .local fits the latter criteria. But yes, it does make the requirement
> criteria more fuzzy.
>
> _______________________________________________
> DNSOP mailing list
> DNSOP@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
We should be looking at mechanisms to allow the root zone to
be distributed to every iterative resolver in the world.
You then don't have to use AS112 to absorb the load. The local
resolver will answer the query.
Mark
--
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
