In message <[email protected]>, Mark Andrews writes: > > In message <[email protected]>, David Conr > ad > writes: > > On Sep 2, 2009, at 5:36 PM, Mark Andrews wrote: > > > With IPv6 the address blocks should be stable to ALL customers. > > > > Buy stock in memory manufacturers for routing vendors. > > People don't move house very often. A new address block when > changing house is reasonable. People accept land line numbers > changing when they move house or pay monthly to have the number > redirected. I fail to see how this will cause the route explosion > you seem to be worried about.
ISP's don't split POPs very often either. Residential cable and ADSL are essentially static today unless the ISP goes out of its way to make the address change. I see no reason why IPv6 won't be the same in this respect. The difference between residential and commercial is one is guaranteed static and the other isn't. Address changes are co-orinated if they have to occur with one and unannounced with the other. > > Sorry, wrong list. > > > > Regards, > > -drc > -- > Mark Andrews, ISC > 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia > PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: [email protected] > _______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop -- Mark Andrews, ISC 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: [email protected] _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
