Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 07:46:08AM +0900, Masataka Ohta wrote:
>> I already gave an example of capital form of 'c' with cedille is
>> often plain 'C' without cedille and seldom 'C' with cedille, even
>> though tools of ISO 8859/1 and Unicode support 'C' with cedille.
>
> Changing the example does not make your case any stronger.
It's merely that you ignored one of my examples.
It is not necessary to make my cases any stronger against
your weak statement:
> It is certainly true that the DNS-protocol case preservation but case
> insensitivity matching rules are not internationalized exactly as one
> might like in IDNA2008.
Note again that my cases are for French localization with ISO
8859/1, the least difficult localization beyond ASCII, which
is already enough to show IDNA2008 unusable.
Imagine what will happen beyond that.
>> Now, may I ask where are facts supporting *YOUR* assumptions?
>
> I'm not sure which assumptions you're talking about.
That's fine. You don't have to show any facts.
Masataka Ohta
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
