On Dec 12, 2011, at 9:44 PM, Peter Koch wrote: > The PROTO writeup for 4641bis is in the makings and > the WG has reached consensus concerning the scope and content of the draft, > therefore > it is too late now to add another aspect, also given the considerable length > of > the document.
Process point: it is only too late to add to the scope or content of the draft until after the IESG has approved it as an RFC. The PROTO writeup comes before AD evaluation; the AD can (and often does) say "please add discussion of this topic that you left out; only then will I move it to IETF Last Call". Further, during IETF Last Call, it is quite appropriate for community members to say "the document doesn't cover Topic A, and it should"; the AD then decides whether or not to ask the WG to do so. Yes, this document is years late. However, if there is relevant topic that is not covered, the history of lateness is not a good enough reason to ignore it. Personal opinion: how validators work is very relevant to this document, and very important to have in a BCP as soon as possible. --Paul Hoffman _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
