-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I believe work on such a document has not yet started. The decision is logged in the minutes of the dnsop wg meeting at ietf78:
http://tools.ietf.org/wg/dnsop/minutes?item=minutes78.html Best regards, Matthijs On 12/22/2011 03:54 PM, Paul Hoffman wrote: > On Dec 22, 2011, at 3:00 AM, Matthijs Mekking wrote: > >> While I agree that it is important to have a similar informational >> document for validators, I believe that it should not be part of >> 4641bis, given its length. Also, The working group has decided to put it >> in a separate document during the meeting at IETF78. > > Sorry, I forgot that decision. It is not reflected in the charter, and I > don't see any WG drafts that cover the topic. Which draft is doing so? > > --Paul Hoffman > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJO81NnAAoJEA8yVCPsQCW5u7gIAMAN1zxQ5VBsQI5GYVP5R6jn 84Vy9nrbfzFNg2pWpUuvia/kmCp5TrgYslfLFdUlUC4jaH+9REzpsYPDkx8ivwIV 9H9vpbIgi9Z8WLp8dce+LS8aqsTBzeKBpzheHf6M25DREtQRaB7VBYO+vkjaQ+oI bhpqygl8Dfvu+mKXTuI835LtKqtuMCVJAXoJau4VJlfGugDu0VRVn/KzWrCeKoHs m0QuccVmgdzLMElL5N5EMcMCVWZO/0JQo3jfayrVrarFW3UqPRqIajgtN4aTmdnA +OUogTiqoEo9o/MaJE0ney9GvfCYmZrXWl23siXfHOue8e+gGCDI7uVJ+15UPoI= =v6xS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
