On 13 apr 2012, at 23:19, David Conrad wrote: > More pragmatically, while I understand the theory behind rejecting NTAs, I > have to admit it feels a bit like the IETF rejecting NATs and/or DNS > redirection. I would be surprised if folks who implement NTAs will stop using > them if they are not accepted by the IETF.
Of course. But if a validator suddenly see that something is costing them too much, they "just" turn off validation. Done! Why do IETF have to say anything at all related to the architecture if this is down to a business cost? ;-) Patrik _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
