Hi all, We have two drafts on the table relating to extensions to AS112 service, in particular to accommodate delegation or redirection of new zones to the infrastructure:
draft-wkumari-dnsop-omniscient-as112 draft-jabley-dnsop-as112-dname I suspect that it makes no sense to proceed with both approaches (although perhaps someone else here thinks differently). I have talked to Warren, and the sensible approach seems to be to discuss both approaches here, and choose one of them. At that point we can merge useful text, authors, etc and proceed with the polish on the selected option. Could we ask the chairs to help facilitate this discussion? Thanks, Joe _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
