We (Peter and I) were going to discuss these coming up this week, but we
felt the combining was the right direction.
If a disinterested third party would be willing to facilitate please
step up, otherwise I will be able to (but a little thin on time till
tomorrow).
tim
On 7/1/13 1:32 PM, Joe Abley wrote:
Hi all,
We have two drafts on the table relating to extensions to AS112 service, in
particular to accommodate delegation or redirection of new zones to the
infrastructure:
draft-wkumari-dnsop-omniscient-as112
draft-jabley-dnsop-as112-dname
I suspect that it makes no sense to proceed with both approaches (although
perhaps someone else here thinks differently).
I have talked to Warren, and the sensible approach seems to be to discuss both
approaches here, and choose one of them. At that point we can merge useful
text, authors, etc and proceed with the polish on the selected option.
Could we ask the chairs to help facilitate this discussion?
Thanks,
Joe
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
