On 2013-07-01, at 13:45, Warren Kumari <[email protected]> wrote: > In the mean time -- assuming that we test DNAME and find out that: > A: it is well supported
A.5: the interactions between components are not harmful in the event that DNAME is not supported (i.e. that CNAME synthesis mitigates the lack of support, and that the interactions in that case are benign) > B: works well enough. > C: doesn't have any bad side effects > does anyone have any compelling reasons why we wouldn't simply go the DNAME > route? Joe _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
