Klaus Malorny wrote:
> please take into account that a CNAME + DNAME, the previously discussed
> BNAME or the now discussed ENAME solution is still interesting for
> domain name registries that have to deal with (maybe lots of) IDN
> variants.
Scalability of IDN labels of equivalent characters is exponential.
Thus, the only solution against it is to give it up.
Masataka Ohta\
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop