On 22.05.2014 03:18, Masataka Ohta wrote:
Klaus Malorny wrote:
Sure, but I am talking of about 5-20 variants per name, not all that are
combinatorially possible.
The idea is that the registrant simply decides which of the variants he
wants to have included with his original name. Those would be added to
the zone via redirection resource records, whatever available. When he
reaches a registry given limit, he has to make a trade-off, which of the
possible variants he regards as most valuable for his purpose. From my
perspective, this is an acceptable compromise.
OK. If it is acceptable for you, allow 1 variant per name and we
are done.
That people around you are happy with at most 5 or 20 variants
does not mean other people needing more variants may suffer
from the trade-off.
A better solution is never use IDN. That, even within European
(French) context, capital form of 'y' with diaeresis can be 'Y'
or 'Y' with diaeresis is already bad enough for case insensitive
DNS.
What's the purpose of this comment? Are you saying that you don't care about
real world problems? Get rid of IDNs? Learn English or die? Internet back to its
roots as an academic, non-commerical network? This all would be fine to me, but
unfortunately not to many people out there.
Regards,
Klaus
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
