On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 9:10 AM, Shane Kerr <[email protected]> wrote:
> Evan, > > I think that moving Fujiwara's fuller proposal forward will likely take > an extra year and don't see any conflict with the cheese shop approach > really. However since the cheese shop won't likely result in any > running code, I also agree with the suggestion to focus on the general > case. > > Why? Everything we need is in the current draft, if anything there is only cutting of text to do. I think the indicator Flag that I (and others) proposed is a bad idea and should either removed or put in the OPT record If we keep it simple then the world will look like this: - resolver MAY apply ANC when it suits them, CD bit is ignored for caching when ANC is in use - Auth operators MUST assume they have no control over if resolvers use ANC and are limited to pleading for help when under attack. In this world we are no worse off than today. Large Auth server operators can only hope that the big resolver farms like Google, OpenDNS, Verisign, Level3, and <mega ISP's> do ANC. For the record the local-root-zone operation does exactly what the Cheese shop wants to do just requires two processes in some cases. Olafur
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
