On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 1:36 PM, Andrew Sullivan <[email protected]> wrote: > That's in effect an argument that the special-names registrations are not > special. I > do not agree with that claim.
>From an extreme point of view (which clearly, contextually, I hold) thats exactly what I think I fundamentally agree with, in what Alain is saying: The special-names are claiming technological override on process which ignores the central unity of all name-strings: for ICANN, for the namespace, these are labels like all the others. They're asking for a joker-card permit, which I have major issues with. That aside, they're just like all the others. The qualities they have in the zone, the records which do or do not exist are in another plane, orthoginal. -G _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
