The definition of QNAME in RFC 2308 feels like it is only relevant when discussing negative caching, not in general. All the other uses of the 1034/1035 definition of QNAME after 2308 feel consistent.

--Paul Hoffman

_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

Reply via email to