On 20 Sep 2016, at 18:13, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
Do you like long terminology discussions, backed by a dozen RFC, where
people disagree on what's written in these RFC? If so, read on.
When I told you about this confusion in your draft I wasn’t even
looking for a long terminology discussion. Be careful what you wish for,
I suppose ;)
RFC 7719 does not define QNAME (probably because it seemed obvious).
I checked 7719 today, was surprised QNAME was not in there. Probably a
good idea to fix for 7719bis?
Is the QNAME "www.afnic.fr" or "lb01-1.nic.fr" ("the data field of the
In my mind, lb01-1.nic.fr, but I understand the other position -
Peter van Dijk
PowerDNS.COM BV - https://www.powerdns.com/
DNSOP mailing list