On 20 Sep 2016, at 19:09, Warren Kumari wrote:

I think the RFC2308 definition is only true in the negative caching
context... or something...

Which, of course, is the context in which draft-ietf-dnsop-nxdomain-cut uses QNAME.

I’m not here to argue which definition of QNAME is correct, but I do think the text could use some clarification to avoid this confusion. Easiest might be to point at 2308 as that definition is functionally identical to the longer texts the draft has now.

Kind regards,
Peter van Dijk
PowerDNS.COM BV - https://www.powerdns.com/

DNSOP mailing list

Reply via email to