On Mon, 19 Dec 2016 10:59:31 +0100 bert hubert <bert.hub...@powerdns.com> wrote: > On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 11:50:02AM +0200, ac wrote: <snip> > Maybe the internet was a mistake then. But I don't think we'll > convince you. > Huge segments of the internet do think this is a good idea. And like > other standards, this could be used for bad purposes. But that > doesn't mean we shouldn't do it. > So I'm afraid we won't make you happy if your bar is 'any standard > that could be used for bad things shouldn't happen'.
I do not think that "huge segments of the Internet" thinks it is a good idea to lie and to deceive. To be clear and to boil it down: This draft publishes a method to supply different answers to different users and to hide the truth of those lies to the same users. Unless a registry, court or resource owner authorizes this, it is lying, cheating, "fraudy" and definately deceptive. (like a cockroach when exposed to light) I think that if people knew what we were talking about and truly understood the issues, there would be an uprising. If "huge segments of the Internet" thinks it is okay to lie, cheat, deceive and steal I guess I will still say that I do not agree. Andre _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
