On 2/16/17, 12:23, "Suzanne Woolf" <suzworldw...@gmail.com> wrote: On Feb 16, 2017, at 11:46 AM, Russ Housley <hous...@vigilsec.com> wrote: Ed: >>>It would be good to provide a list of requests for new special use names. >>>Especially for a problem statement, this provides a way to estimate the >>>"size and shape" of the problem and the urgency. (Russ:) >>No matter how you count, the volume will remain small if this is done >>properly. However, the special name requests can still be >>important and urgent. (Suzanne:) >I also note it’s fairly difficult to estimate. > >... .home/.corp/.mail ... .onion ... .alt ... .homenet
There is also a use of .id by Blockstack? as opposed to the ccTLD for
Indonesia. (This one just jumps to mind.)
I did some looking and despite thinking there was once a backlog of a dozen, I
haven't come across it in the mailing list. (I could be wrong.) What about
.belkin, often cited as a string seen but not allocated?
My goal is to see the problem statement document get more detailed so we can
know when we've solved the problem. ("The problem" is meant to be general, not
necessarily the problem at hand.)
>All of the drafts besides those for .onion, .alt, and .homenet have expired,
>which tells us nothing about whether or how they might come back.
I don't think liveness of drafts is a sufficient measure of activity,
considering the problem statement talks about uses from folks not engaging in
the IETF process. (If I'm hungry and in line at a restaurant, then walk away
because the wait is too long, I'm still hungry.)
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
