On Sat, Jul 01, 2017 at 02:40:43PM -0700, [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote a message of 45 lines which said:
> Title : DNS Terminology > Authors : Paul Hoffman > Andrew Sullivan > Kazunori Fujiwara > Filename : draft-ietf-dnsop-terminology-bis-06.txt One of the issues I would like to discuss for terminology-bis is the definition of QNAME. I filed this erratum against RFC 2308 : https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=2308&eid=4983 Five months later, it has not been accepted or rejected. So, it is time to poke the WG: do you think we should mark the RFC 2308 as wrong, and keep only the definition of RFC 1034? _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
