On 24.8.2017 16:21, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: > On Sat, Jul 01, 2017 at 02:40:43PM -0700, > [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote > a message of 45 lines which said: > >> Title : DNS Terminology >> Authors : Paul Hoffman >> Andrew Sullivan >> Kazunori Fujiwara >> Filename : draft-ietf-dnsop-terminology-bis-06.txt > > One of the issues I would like to discuss for terminology-bis is the > definition of QNAME. I filed this erratum against RFC 2308 : > > https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=2308&eid=4983 > > Five months later, it has not been accepted or rejected. So, it is > time to poke the WG: do you think we should mark the RFC 2308 as > wrong, and keep only the definition of RFC 1034?
I vote for keeping RFC 1034 definition and declaring RFC 2308 wrong. -- Petr Špaček @ CZ.NIC _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
