We might want to invent a new term here like effective qname, but basically I
agree with Mark. 2308 was written after bind itself learned the distinction.
On August 24, 2017 3:27:34 PM PDT, Mark Andrews <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>RFC 2308 is consistent with RFC 1034.
>
>Go read *all* of RFC 1034. QNAME is used to refer to *both* the
>original
>*and* updated value after following a CNAME.
>
>Mark
>--
>Mark Andrews, ISC
>1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
>PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: [email protected]
>
>_______________________________________________
>DNSOP mailing list
>[email protected]
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
