The BCP14 keyword compliance question sounds like a worthwhile exercise, but I can't do it this week. I'm certainly not deliberately violating the specification. As to what implementation it is, it's a modification to the mDNSResponder code base to support mDNS queries over the mDNS relay protocol. I suppose "interoperating" was the wrong choice of words—I have two different services talking to each other: one is a Discovery Relay, and the other is a Discovery Proxy. I'd really like to get some other implementation to test against—are you volunteering? :)
On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 7:28 AM, Job Snijders <j...@instituut.net> wrote: > Dear Ted, > > On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 3:09 PM, Ted Lemon <mel...@fugue.com> wrote: > > Yes. I'm using it right now to implement draft-ietf-dnssd-mdns-relay, > and > > that implementation is working and interoperating. I don't know of > another > > independent implementation yet, unfortunately. > > Can you elaborate a bit more? What is the name of the implementation? > This is an implementation in progress? I don't fully understand how > there can be interoperating if there is no other implementation. > > I see roughly 150 (!) BCP14 keywords in this draft. Can you specify > for your implementation for each of these normative keywords whether > your implementation is complaint, or not, and if not why not? > > Kind regards, > > Job >
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
