> On Jun 12, 2018, at 10:28 AM, Job Snijders <j...@instituut.net> wrote: > > Dear Ted, > > On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 3:09 PM, Ted Lemon <mel...@fugue.com> wrote: >> Yes. I'm using it right now to implement draft-ietf-dnssd-mdns-relay, and >> that implementation is working and interoperating. I don't know of another >> independent implementation yet, unfortunately. > > Can you elaborate a bit more? What is the name of the implementation? > This is an implementation in progress? I don't fully understand how > there can be interoperating if there is no other implementation. > > I see roughly 150 (!) BCP14 keywords in this draft. Can you specify > for your implementation for each of these normative keywords whether > your implementation is complaint, or not, and if not why not? > > Kind regards, > > Job
I did an initial implementation of a client and server for DNS push notifications which is based on Stateful Operations. This code isn’t public and I haven’t looked at it for about 6 months. But it did identify some issues early on in the draft that we corrected for. Thanks, Tom _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
