> On Jun 12, 2018, at 10:28 AM, Job Snijders <j...@instituut.net> wrote:
> Dear Ted,
> On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 3:09 PM, Ted Lemon <mel...@fugue.com> wrote:
>> Yes.   I'm using it right now to implement draft-ietf-dnssd-mdns-relay, and
>> that implementation is working and interoperating.   I don't know of another
>> independent implementation yet, unfortunately.
> Can you elaborate a bit more? What is the name of the implementation?
> This is an implementation in progress? I don't fully understand how
> there can be interoperating if there is no other implementation.
> I see roughly 150 (!) BCP14  keywords in this draft. Can you specify
> for your implementation for each of these normative keywords whether
> your implementation is complaint, or not, and if not why not?
> Kind regards,
> Job

I did an initial implementation of a client and server for DNS push 
notifications which is based on Stateful Operations. This code isn’t public and 
I haven’t looked at it for about 6 months. But it did identify some issues 
early on in the draft that we corrected for.


DNSOP mailing list

Reply via email to