Il 20 agosto 2018 alle 17.55 Ted Lemon<[email protected]> ha scritto: I am entirely within my rights to use DoH whether the network operator likes it or not.
so, their network, but not their rules? when spammers used to tell me that sending spam wasn't illegal and i had to accept it, i blackholed them and said, my network, my rules. who has what rights, and why?
It is certainly true that in some cases, someone using DoH would be violating a network operator policy that is enforceable, or would be violating the law. But that is by no means the most common case, and it does you no credit to pretend otherwise.
some references i've seen go by in this thread indicate that the DoH team wants its protocol to be unblockable, and hopes that RDNS DOH providers will co-locate their DOH endpoints with other valuable content, "so that network operators will think twice about blocking it."
if there are use cases beyond violating the law and violating network operator security policy, then they are obviously secondary, but do tell-- what do you think those might be?
i also block tor endpoints. because, my network, my rules. if it's going to be my network but mozilla's or cloudflare's rules, then this conversation is going to travel very differently, because i'll still be paying for it, but it won't be _my_ network any more. would that sit well with you? it wouldn't with me.
-- P Vixie _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
