On 11/28/19 4:24 PM, Joe Abley wrote:
On Nov 28, 2019, at 19:07, Doug Barton <[email protected]> wrote:
Can you please explain why ICANN's work on name collision and the ongoing
onslaught of queries at the root for un-delegated TLDs are not sufficient
evidence?
If it's not obvious from the questions I asked, then perhaps not.
What I'm looking for are specific areas in which the existing volume of
evidence is lacking. We already have a lot of data which addresses the
questions you raised. What is it about the existing data which is
inadequate? What data do you want to see collected instead?
And if not, how do you propose that we study it?
By avoiding words like "onslaught" and building substantiated
conclusions from data.
Thank you for defining "study." What I'm looking for is a specific plan.
If you don't have one in mind, or can't be bothered to create one, then
this feels like another example of "We have to study the problem more"
as an excuse not to take action. (I would be very happy to be proven
wrong though.)
Doug
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
