[Sorry for the slow response — US holidays and a resolution not to look at my computer over said holidays got in the way]
Doug, On Nov 27, 2019, at 8:39 PM, Doug Barton <[email protected]> wrote: > I agree with Matt, Bill Woodcock, Steve Crocker, and others that have > expressed that we should stay out of ISO's sandbox. No one is suggesting we get into their sandbox. > Whatever the rules are today, they can change, and poaching their stuff for > our purposes is bad form (and yes, I feel that poaching is what is being > proposed, in spite of the arguments to the contrary). I’m confused. ISO 3166 says a set of codes are intended for user defined purposes. What is being proposed is using those codes for user defined purposes. How can this be construed as poaching? > ICANN has already said that it's not going to ever delegate CORP, HOME, or > MAIL. No, ICANN has not said that. Regards, -drc (Speaking for myself, not any organization I may be affiliated with)
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
