On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 1:50 PM Tim Wicinski <tjw.i...@gmail.com> wrote:
> All, > > As we stated in the meeting and in our chairs actions, we're going to run > regular call for adoptions over next few months. > We are looking for *explicit* support for adoption. > > > This starts a Call for Adoption for > draft-andrews-dnsop-glue-is-not-optional > > The draft is available here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-andrews-dnsop-glue-is-not-optional/ > > Please review this draft to see if you think it is suitable for adoption > by DNSOP, and comments to the list, clearly stating your view. > > Please also indicate if you are willing to contribute text, review, etc. > > This call for adoption ends: 1 June 2020 > I've read the draft. It's a useful clarification to the spec, so I support adoption and will review etc. I have one question for the Mark A though: Since you specifically cite the example of the GOV servers, did you ask Verisign about this behavior, and if so, what was their response? Maybe this is just a bug, rather than a "widespread misbelief" about additional data & truncation that you more generally attribute as the cause for this. Shumon
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
