Tim Wicinski wrote:
This starts a Call for Adoption for draft-andrews-dnsop-glue-is-not-optional
The draft is available here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-andrews-dnsop-glue-is-not-optional/
Please review this draft to see if you think it is suitable for adoption
by DNSOP, and comments to the list, clearly stating your view.
While I'm not against the clarification, the draft should mention
that rfc1034 already states:
To fix this problem, a zone contains "glue" RRs which are not
part of the authoritative data, and are address RRs for the servers.
These RRs are only necessary if the name server's name is "below" the
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
cut, and are only used as part of a referral response.
^^^^^^^^^
which means the glue RRs are necessary for a referral response.
Though not very obvious, it logically means that they MUST be
included as part of a referral response, because it is the only
reason to make them necessary.
Masataka Ohta
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
